Archive for March, 2012

George Orwell wrote of a memory hole, where inconvenient facts end up if ‘they’ don’t want you to remember them. Even if we don’t accept that Einstein was actually a plagiarist, he’s somehow remembered whilst his contemporaries lie forgotten – including earlier relativity theorists.

The point of interest in this book review isn’t whether Einstein was a plagiarist, but the creation of his popular image. Somehow the image of Einstein has been promoted in the popular mind whilst his contemporaries were deliberately sent down the ‘memory hole’, into their present state of obscurity.

Review of Roger Schlafly’s “How Einstein Ruined Physics”
Mark Green

Though the book isn’t available free online, searching the author’s blog will reveal more information about the history of relativity and the overestimation of Einstein as well as the nonsense that the history of science is a result of ‘paradigm shifts’ – which, if it were true, would mean science isn’t a process increasing human knowledge. The myth of paradigm shifts was pushed to legitimise the politicised exclusion of ideologically hostile academics by presenting such purges as historically normal, and the image of Einstein and other figures such as Copernicus as revolutionary figures changing the world of science forever, is abused towards these ends.


Read Full Post »

Thanks to Facebook, the ‘enemies of freedom’ in the Arab world might have taken a back seat to Joseph Kony, but what are the Arab revolts against ‘dictators’ like Assad really about? The Western media presents them as popular support for Western democracy; but is that the real motivation for the opposition?

Feminist Syrian First Lady: “I am the real dictator”
W.F. Price

Read Full Post »

Its been reported on the news that over in France an unknown gunman has arrived at a Jewish school and opened fire, killing a rabbi and three students. The phrase ‘anti-Semitism’ is predictably invoked in the media, although the killer and his actual motivations are as yet unknown.

The God of Tolerance
Colin Liddell

I left one of my best comments over at Alt Right:

You do not need to justify the actions of people such as the unknown Toulouse gunman or Anders Brevik, nor agree with their politics (we don’t even know what motivates the Toulouse gunman yet), to realise such actions are a response to our society – the first stirrings of a civilisational gag reflex.

Of course the media misrepresented Brevik as an extremist motivated by racial hatred and Christian fundamentalism, when the real Brevik is an anti-racist opposed to Islam because he’s a secular ‘cultural Christian’ – if Brevik can be called a religious fanatic, then so can Richard Dawkins because he likes singing Christmas carols every year.

The murder of Pim Fortuyn by Volkert ven der Graaf was deliberately misattributed to animal rights activism, a mostly leftist movement but one with some links to the feared ‘far right’ (ie Savitri Devi), when the assassin was in fact motivated by a misguided desire to defend Dutch Muslims from “persecution”.

The infamous ‘Unabomber’ Theodore Kaczynski is a man still considered by many as a left wing nutcase who wishes to abolish all civilisation through the efforts of the media. Yet his ‘Unabomber Manifesto, properly entitled “Industrial Society and Its Future”, is actually a devastating attack upon the political left and the modern society that creates and enables them whilst dismantling the family, rather than some straw man anti-human screed.

The Olympic Park Bomber Eric Rudolf is mispresented by the media as an ‘anti-woman’ religious nutcase who blew up abortion clinics, another straw man created in order to scapegoat America’s ‘religious right’ that hasn’t got the guts. But Rudolf, although a Christian, prefers the philosophy of Freidrich “God is dead” Nietzsche to the Bible, and his views on abortion are merely part of a far wider critique of modern American society – after all, the Olympic Park Stadium was not an abortuary.

Do we see a pattern here?

I won’t believe anything ‘they’ say about about the Toulouse gunman at face value.

Read Full Post »

Choicetards and the left speak of overpopulation to justify selfish, lifestyles in Britain, but native Britons are actually subject to the real demographic problem now affecting many countries – we’re faced with an aging population through our family size having decreased to below replacement level.

The Fertility Implosion
David Brooks

Westerners love to bash Japan for protectionism and their inspiring, ‘xenophobic’ sense of national pride. But Japan’s real problem is their aging population.

Land of the Setting Sun
Patrick J. Buchanan

Sometimes the most interesting thing about online articles seems to be the comments to them. According to ‘Nergol’:

I’m a serious Catholic, and as pro-life as anybody you’re going to find, but blaming legalized abortion and widely available birth control for Japan’s demographic decline relative to other nations is somewhat unconvincing. One in 15 or so Japanese women has had an abortion. In the UK, about 30% of women have. In the US, it’s about 40%. Japan also only legalized the birth control pill in the last decade or so. So while I’m not saying that isn’t a factor, it doesn’t explain the collapse relative to those other nations.

Incidentally, the statistic for the UK is wrong; only one fifth of British pregnancies actually end by a purposefully induced abortion, and about a third of those are at least the third abortion for the woman. But whatever the moral objections to abortion might be, there’s a need to ask why individuals make antinatalist choices in the first place. Which kind of circumstances contribute to smaller family sizes?

Is modern society actually suicidal? Is there a way we can stop ourselves going extinct by autogenocide, like the Japanese seem to be headed?

Read Full Post »

Isn’t it funny how criticism of Islam is ‘politically incorrect’, yet also framed so carefully not to offend anyone the left likes?

In my opinion, people should learn to look at things in three dimensons.

Home-grown freedoms are the strongest
Charles Moore

I’ve left my two cents in a Disqus comment.

Theo Van Gogh was scum like the sleazy Pim Fortuyn, and I ain’t no anti-racis’.

In their idealism and abstract language, coming from educations and backgrounds far from reality, they thought no degree of cultural difference could prevent millions of Moslems from assimilating into their multicult utopia – indeed, they assumed the Moslems would *want* to forget their culture, and buy into the dream.

Right now its obviously gone all wrong, as Moslem immigrants defend their own culture in the West, just as Westerners ought to have done long ago.

Did the Moslems create the immigration policy that brought them here?

Was it Moslems or the left who’ve been responsible for so much censorship?

Keeping Islam here benefits the multicult; anti-Islam benefits the fags and the feminists. The left realise they can’t have it both ways after all, but they can benefit either way by controlling the ‘free’ speech they’re protecting.

Schmidt said “Sovereign is he who decides on the exception.” Isn’t it odd that all criticism of Islam must be framed in terms hostile to religion in general, to be acceptable? That you can bash the Islamic presence in the west for the religion’s perspective on homosexuality or the burqa, but not mention HBD, or demographic replacement?

Really, hypocrites like Theo Van Gogh are every bit as politically correct as the people who brought Islam into the Netherlands – and promoted his sexual tastes.

Read Full Post »

This article is pretty much the sort of thing I find appealing, but it still appears to be wishful thinking when the conservative mindset is averse to attempting positive change, because its instinct is to keep things as they presently are, to avoid the necessary radicalism.

If people are planning to build housing on Green Belt land, we should remember two reasons why there’s a demand for more housing in the first place – immigration and people owning more than one home.

A Vindication of Natural Society
David Hamilton

Read Full Post »

Like a lot of people, I haven’t got very much idea of the background to Ugandan politics and Kony 2012. how many people actually understand whats going on over there? Idi Amin was made famous in the Last king of Scotland but have you ever heard of Apollo Milton Obote and his ‘moderate’ reign of terror over there?

And why’s the Kony bashing started at this present place and time, when he’s been around for years? Has the discovery of oil in Africa got anything to do with a new, pro-war viral campaign aimed at the demographic most likely to oppose foreign interventionism?

Altar Boy vs. Altar Boy in Uganda: the Lord’s Resistance Army & Joseph Kony
Gary Brecher

Kony 2012 & Fifth Generation Warfare
Christopher Pankhurst

Read Full Post »

Proponents of Western capitalism like to speak of the rival Japanese economic system as having failed, and refer to Japan as having ‘lost decades’. But is this actually true? As it turns out, the ‘dead’ stock market harms neither Japanese consumers nor the protectionist Japanese economy, and talk of Japan’s lost decades is based on an oversimplification of what economic growth actually is – it can’t be reduced simply to GDP growth.

The Myth of Japan’s Lost Decades
Kel Kelly

Read Full Post »

There’s a reason why feminists support reproductive choice as strongly as they do. Haven’t you ever noticed how they exclude men from the possible outcomes of pregnancy?

The Cold Hard Truth on Equalizing Reproductive Rights

The unfortunate babies murdered every year because they don’t fit in with mummies lifestyle, are really just collateral damage in a gender war aren’t they?

Simply consider the hypocrisy about gender selective abortion in the UK and abroad – for which feminists actually blame ‘patriarchal’ Asian cultures in which abortion and infanticide are sins. Of course you can refute these claims simply by demographic trends – the gender imbalances in places such as India are not a historical social phenomenon, but modern social problem, and gender selection is a phenomenon among the educated, as new ideas about the unborn reach other cultures from the West, then blend with native ideas as they are received first by cosmopolitan, higher status individuals. The result of this localised westernisation is that a South Asian abortionist realises that there’s no difference between gender selection and any other kind of family planning, even if his or her clinic is in the UK.

You could say that gynocidal abortion in the UK is a bit like homegrown terrorism – invade the world, invite the world, but this time with ideas instead of bombs.

Of course the reason feminists start to bitch like Evangelicals about the abortion only of female children, is because it takes away a stick to bash men with. The observant will have noticed the only male impregnators pro-choicers normally mention are rapists and incestuous dads – their attitude towards men ought to give their game away, shouldn’t it?

Read Full Post »


Steve Sailor’s made a couple of interesting posts regarding biological race. One of them involves the politically motivated ‘race does not exist’ myth and the other one is about dingos and dogs – a good analogy for human races yet to taxonomise canine diversity is not taboo.

The only way in which ‘race does not exist’ is in the sense that biological taxonomy only labels biodiversity, the races of man are clearly equivalent to the subspecies of wild animals and the landraces of domestic ones. The label of ‘species’ is arbitrary with no fixed criteria agreed upon, but no one tries to insult my intelligence with arguments that species do not really exist.

The History of a Myth

The Dingo as the Default Dog?

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Regulus Seradly

4 out of 5 dentists recommend this WordPress.com site

Destroy Zionism!

Exposing the World Parasite